Category Archives: Pennsylvania Firearms Law

Call to Action – HB 1243 – Strengthening Preemption

I just received notice from Pennsylvania Representative Stephen Bloom that HB 1243, just passed its third consideration in the House by a vote of 143-54. There are only several days left to get this through the Senate and we’re going to need YOUR help!

Emails are insufficient. We’re being outnumbered by 3-1 in calls to Representatives and Senators. We need to change this.

Personal contact by phone calls and snail mail (faxes) are much more effective to get your message to our Senators and then NEED to hear from us.

The contact info for Senate Judiciary Committee is here.

Senator Stewart Greenleaf (R) chairman JC (717) 787-6599
(note Greenleaf is up for re election in 2014 IF Greenleaf is your senator twist arm as required to run HB 1243)

Senator Joseph Scarnati (R) leader of senate – President Pro Tempore (717) 787-7084 everyone must call or fax Senator Scarnati
He is very supportive on Second Amendment issues…. he still needs to hear from US!

Senator Gene Yaw (R) (717) 787-3280

Senator John Gordner (R) (717) 787-8928

Senator John Eichelberger (R) (717) 787-5490

Senator John Rafferty (R) (717) 787-1398

Senator Randy Vulakovich (R) (717) 787-6538

Senator Richard Alloway (R) (717) 787-4651

Senator Lisa Boscola (D) (717) 787-4236

Senator Andrew Dinniman (D) (717) 787-5709

Senator Dominic Pileggi (R) (717) 787-4712 swings lots of weight in senate from holding past leadership position of senate

These below on JC probably will not listen unless they are your senators, expect them to vote against HB 1243.

Stress the Rule of Law.

Senator Michael Stack (D) (717) 787-9608

Senator Daylin Leach (D) (717) 787-5544 minority chair of JC – past ceasefirepa endorsed candidate going to probably be one of the most vocal against HB 1243 on committee

Senator Wayne Fontana (D) (717) 787-5300 up for re election in 2014 but has no opponent = no fear factor from voters

Senator Lawrence Farnese (D) (717) 787-5662 past ceasefirepa endorsed candidate

CALL and/or FAX senators especially Scarnati, Greenleaf, Pileggi (plus others listed) and ask them to pass HB 1243 without any amendments.

Also ask your senator to bug leadership to run HB 1243 as a clean bill

HB 1243 will take at least 3 days in senate for passage.

Getting HB 1243 passed is still do able, but it’s going to take everyone making the extra effort to get this passed in the short time left. Governor Corbett will sign this bill if placed on his desk!

Senator Scarnati as leader of the senate can add more session days IF its required and most importantly IF we make our voices loud enough!

We have the votes for passage in the senate is just a matter of making them feel the heat and making HB 1243 a priority for quick passage with such short session time left.

PLEASE do your part and get HB 1243 passed by the Senate as a clean bill.

Thanks to FOAC (Firearm Owners Against Crime) for the above information.


Filed under Firearms Law, Pennsylvania Firearms Law

Putting Attorney General Kane’s Legal Opinion to Good Use

Today, utilizing Attorney General Kane’s August 5, 2014, Legal Opinion Letter, I submitted letters to a number of Commonwealth agencies requesting that they rescind their regulations in relation to possession of firearms, which are inconsistent with Pennsylvania’s Crimes Code, referred to as Title 18. Those letters include:

  1. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education (PASSHE) – here.
  2. Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR) – here.
  3. Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry (L&I) – here.
  4. Pennsylvania Department of State – here.

As I hear back from these agencies as to what action they will be taking, I will let our readers know.


Filed under Firearms Law, Pennsylvania Firearms Law

Attorney General Kane’s Opinion on Commonwealth Agencies Regulating Possession of Firearms

As I previously blogged about, I wrote a letter to the PA Gaming Control Board requesting that it invalidate 58 Pa.Code § 465a.13, as it had unlawfully regulated the possession of firearms in casinos, pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 6109(m.3)(2). On September 8, 2014, I heard back from the PA Gaming Control Board that it would be rescinding the regulation of firearms, pursuant to a Legal Opinion of Attorney General Kane. At that time, I was not provided a copy of the Legal Opinion but have since come into possession of it.

On August 5, 2014, Attorney General Kane issued a Legal Opinion letter stating:

“…the Board’s regulation at 58 Pa.Code § 465a.13(a) contravenes 18 Pa.C.S. § 6109(m.3)…Section 6109(m.3), on the other hand, prohibits a Commonwealth agency from regulating the possession of a firearm in any manner inconsistent with Title 18. The Board is a Commonwealth agency….Accordingly, the Board’s regulation is inconsistent with the provisions of Title 18 inasmuch it regulates the possession of firearms in a location (licensed casino facility) not contemplated by Title 18.”

It looks like many other Commonwealth agencies (Dept of State, PASSHE, DCNR, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation, … etc) may be on the receiving end of demands to rescind their unlawful regulations…


Filed under Firearms Law, Pennsylvania Firearms Law

Perry County Update: Nauman Smith Law Firm Requests Extension for Right to Know Law Request

On August 28, 2014, I submitted a Right to Know Law (RTKL) Request to Perry County for all receipts and disbursements by Nauman Smith Law Firm in relation to its representation of the Perry County Auditors. Pursuant to Section 506(d)(1) of the RTKL, third parties possessors must disclose public record, pursuant to the RTKL. On August 29, 2014, it was forwarded to Nauman Smith Law Firm. On September 8, 2014, pursuant to Section 902, Nauman Smith Law Firm requested thirty (30) additional days to respond.

I am somewhat perplexed as to why Nauman Smith Law Firm is unable to immediately provide an accounting of its receipts and disbursements (financial records) related to its representation of the Perry County Auditors. It should not take 30 days to prepare an accounting in a matter that has been billed the entire time. Maybe someone should hire an auditor to assist…It’ll be interesting to see what the accounting reflects….

Leave a comment

Filed under Firearms Law, Pennsylvania Firearms Law

PA Gaming Control Board Acknowledges That Its Regulation is Unlawful!

As many of our viewers are aware, several months ago, on April 19, 2014, I submitted a written request to the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board to invalidate Section 465a.13, as it violated 18 Pa.C.S. § 6109(m.3).  In June, I heard from Chief Counsel of the PA Gaming Control Board that the issue had been forwarded to Attorney General Kane. Today, I heard back from Chief Counsel Sherman that the Attorney General issued a Legal Opinion (I don’t yet have a copy) and that the AG determined that

amendments in 2011 to the Pennsylvania Uniform Firearms Act prohibit the PGCB and other Commonwealth agencies from regulating the possession of firearms in a manner inconsistent with that Act.  Accordingly, the Attorney General states that the Board no longer may by Regulation limit the possession of firearms in a licensed casino facility by persons who possess a valid permit to carry a concealed firearm.  Given this result, we are preparing an amendment to Board regulation 465a.13 will be presented to the Board at its September 17, 2014 meeting to address this issue. (emphasis added)

Attorney Sherman then continued on to point out that the

Attorney General’s Opinion is not an evaluation of whether the private owners of a state-licensed casino facility may or may not limit the possession of firearms in the privately-owned casino.  Thus, each licensed casino facility may or may not chose to limit the possession of firearms on its property.  That is a determination which will be left to the discretion of each casino.

So that makes two wins in one day for LTCF holders!


Filed under Firearms Law, Pennsylvania Firearms Law

Perry County Auditors’ Complaint – DISMISSED

Today, Judge Zanic issued his decision on Sheriff Nace’s Preliminary Objections filed against the Perry County Auditors’ Complaint. A copy of the Order can be obtained here. A copy of the Decision can he obtained here.

The Order simply states, “AND NOW, this 8th day of September, 2014, the Preliminary Objection of Defendant in the nature of a demurrer is SUSTAINED and Plaintiffs’ Complaint is DISMISSED.”

The Decision reviews several of the legal issues involved and declares,

In the case at bar, we have determined that the Complaint is legally insufficient, and as such, a dismissal is required. The Auditors have failed to overcome the demurrer of the Sheriff for two clear and distinct reasons. First, the Complaint improperly seeks to increase the statutory authority of the Perry County Auditors by alleging that auditors in this Commonwealth have the duty to obtain information that was never intended by the statutory language of 16 P.S. §1721 or 16 P.S. §1724. Second, the Complaint does not make any allegation that the Sheriff’s actions have caused the Auditors to fail in performing their statutory duty to audit.

The Decision goes on to state,

Thus, the Complaint appears to be nothing more than a fishing expedition for information unrelated to the Plaintiffs’ statutory duty to audit.




Filed under Firearms Law, Pennsylvania Firearms Law

Perry County Update – New Filings and Rulings!

As many of our viewers are aware, I am representing Sheriff Carl Nace in relation to a lawsuit filed against him by the Perry County Auditors to force him to disclose confidential license to carry firearms (LTCF) information. The hearing is currently scheduled for September 2, 2014, at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 1 of the Perry County Courthouse.

Since my last blog on the PA Sheriffs’ Associations Amended Petition for Leave of Court to file Amicus Curiae, a number of documents have been filed:

  1. The Court Order continuing the matter until September 2, 2014 – here.
  2. President Judge Zanic’s Order GRANTING the PA Sheriffs’ Association’s Petition for Leave to File Amicus Curiae – here.
  3. The Auditors’ Brief in Opposition to our Preliminary Objections – here.
  4. Sheriff Nace’s Brief in Support of the Preliminary Objections – here.
  5. A Petition to Intervene by John Doe 1, 2, 3 and Jane Doe and Preliminary Objections – here.

Judge Zanic has stated that the Petition to Intervene will not be considered at the hearing on September 2nd and will be considered at a later time, if the Preliminary Objections are overruled. Also, I was informed that the reason for the continuance of the hearing (originally scheduled for today) was a result of Courtroom 1 being utilized today for another matter and the fact that only Courtroom 1 is of sufficient size to accommodate the expected attendance.

1 Comment

Filed under Firearms Law, Pennsylvania Firearms Law