YEAR IN REVIEW: MAJOR PENNSYLVANIA AND FEDERAL FIREARMS LAW CASES OF 2023

As the year is coming to a close, we thought it important to document some of the monumental court decisions and issues that Firearms Industry Consulting Group® (FICG®), a division of Civil Rights Defense Firm, P.C., or others were involved in or obtained in 2023.

  1. Williams v. Garland, et al., 19-CV-2641 – we succeeded in an as-applied challenge, obtaining a judgment that it was unconstitutional to strip Mr. Williams’ 2nd amendment rights on the basis of a DUI conviction. We expect the government to appeal this case to the Third Circuit, so stay tuned.
  2. Knife Rights, Inc., et al, v. City of Philadelphia, et al, 2:23-cv-1758 – A district court granted a challenge seeking to throw out a Philadelphia ordinance forbidding the carrying of “cutting weapons,” including common pocket knives, on public streets.
  3. The Matter of Mark McCloyCertiorari was granted by the Maryland Supreme Court to hear an appeal in a case arising from Maryland State Police’s improper denial of a Handgun Qualification License.
  4. John Doe 1, et al.,  v. Franklin County, et al, 2014-cv-4623 – we reached a $3,000,000 settlement for the class members in a class action against Franklin County for improper disclosure of license to carry firearms information.
  5. Firearm Owners Against Crime, et al., v. Lower Marion Township – we filed suit to challenge an unconstitutional zoning ordinance that would make it impossible to operate an FFL in Lower Marion Township.
  6. Grant Schmidt, et al., v. Christopher Pariswe filed suit against the Pennsylvania State Police to enjoin the enforcement of an unconstitutional regulation authorizing warrantless searches of License to Sell Firearms holders, and obtained a temporary injunction for the duration of the proceedings.

So what can we expect for the new year?

  1. A decision from the PA Supreme Court in Barris v. Stroud Township, where we submitted an Amicus Brief on behalf of Allegheny County Sportsmen’s League, Beaver County Conservation League, Firearms Owners Against Crime – Institute for Legal, Legislative, and Educational Action, Unified Sportsmen of PA, and USCCA Legal Defense Foundation. This matter involves “Whether an ordinance that limits target shooting to two non-residential zoning districts, and thus does not provide for shooting ranges at all private residences, is facially unconstitutional under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution.”
  2. A decision from the PA Supreme Court in Crawford, et al. v. Commonwealth, et al, where we submitted an Amicus on behalf of Allegheny County Sportsmen’s League and Firearms Owners Against Crime – Institute for Legal, Legislative, and Educational Action. This matter involves a challenge by the City of Philadelphia to constitutionality of our state firearm preemption statute and its contention that it violates “the Pennsylvania Constitution’s guarantee of all Pennsylvanians’ right to ‘enjoy[] and defend[] life and liberty’ in Article I, Section 1 by prohibiting the enactment of local firearm ordinances?” (Yes, that is the exact language, including the right to defend one’s self, from their question presented….you simply cannot make this stuff up!)
  3. An appeal from the judgment of the District Court in Williams v. Garland.
  4. A decision by the Maryland Supreme Court in The Matter of Mark McCloy.
  5. Further legal challenges to non-violent firearms prohibitions based on the holding in Range v. Attorney General.
  6. A Supreme Court ruling in Rahimi v. United States, which may constitutionally invalidate firearms prohibitions resulting from protective court orders.

How can you stay abreast of important decisions and FICG’s machinegun shoots? Head over to our Newsletter signup page and select the newsletters that you wish to receive!

If you or someone you know has had their right to keep and bear arms infringed, contact Firearms Industry Consulting Group today to discuss YOUR rights and legal options.


Firearms Industry Consulting Group® (FICG®) is a registered trademark and division of Civil Rights Defense Firm, P.C., with rights and permissions granted to Prince Law Offices, P.C. to use in this article.

One thought on “YEAR IN REVIEW: MAJOR PENNSYLVANIA AND FEDERAL FIREARMS LAW CASES OF 2023

Leave a reply to RichD Cancel reply