As discussed in our recent article, earlier this year Attorney General Bondi published an Interim Final Rule reviving the Federal Firearms Relief process under 18 U.S.C. 925(c) by rescinding the delegation of authority to the ATF. The AG’s Interim Final Rule included the below statement explaining that the Department of Justice would at some point in the future promulgate another rulemaking that would presumably outline the new and forthcoming application procedure.
With such a clean slate, the Department anticipates future actions, including rulemaking consistent with applicable law, to give full effect to 18 U.S.C. 925(c) while simultaneously ensuring that violent or dangerous individuals remain disabled from lawfully acquiring firearms.
Notwithstanding that the DOJ has yet to promulgate that rulemaking, AG Bondi has restored the firearms rights of ten individuals.
As many of our readers are likely already aware, we regularly litigate against the state and federal governments on a variety of firearms related topics, including the categories of federally prohibited persons. Resultantly, we are currently involved in several suits against the federal government, and through our litigation efforts, we have learned that the relief process is currently operational.
We are now scheduling consultations with anybody interested in seeking relief from their federal firearms disabilities through the federal firearms relief process. While we are located in Pennsylvania, we are able to assist clients with this process anywhere in the U.S., regardless of where the disability originated. If you or someone you know are prohibited from purchasing or possessing firearms, contact FICG today to discuss your options.
Why You Should Use Our Services
We have been representing individuals for decades in restoring their rights under both federal and state law. We are the only law firm that has extensively investigated, studied, and lectured on pre-1992 relief applications, which provides us with the necessary information – as well as constitutional arguments – to provide you with the best chance for success in your relief application. Moreover, based on our extensive and successful litigation against the U.S. Government for deprivation of Second Amendment rights, we have the inside track on how to currently file relief applications. That’s right; the U.S. Government is so accustomed to losing to us that it has provided us with the information to seek administrative relief, so that it doesn’t have to go up against us in the federal courts!
And our unmatched, forward thinking in how to win challenges in the courts is something we bring to our clients in their initial applications. While there is a statutory ability to appeal any denied relief application in the federal courts, an appeal to the federal courts costs a LOT of money. While other firms, once they get up to speed, will provide lackluster legal advice and guidance during your application phase – with the hopes of you paying them for an appeal to the district court when you are denied – we not only care deeply about our clients and their rights, but also, our Founders’ intent. That’s why, if you retain us to represent your interests in any initial relief determination, we will make it virtually impossible for the U.S. Government to deny your application. And in the event they do, they will have an almost insurmountable burden before the district court, if you follow our advice.
The choice is clear – if you want to get an application submitted before thousands of others and want the best representation with a track-record of consistently WINNING so HUGELY that the Government has provided us with the inside track so we stop suing them, contact FICG today!
Firearms Industry Consulting Group® (FICG®) is a registered trademark and division of Civil Rights Defense Firm, P.C., with rights and permissions granted to Prince Law Offices, P.C. to use in this article.
Prince Law Offices Blog 
One thought on “Federal Firearms Relief – We Have The Inside Track On Filing Applications Now, Before Everyone Else”