Russian Roulette – The Death Of The PA Republican Party By Its Own Hand

It truly pains me to write this article but it is a necessary evil, if there is any chance of the Republican Party surviving in Pennsylvania.

Two months ago, I had pretty much made up my mind to write a lengthy article about my experience running for the Commonwealth Court and even signaled this in my Campaign’s Faceboook post, stating that in the upcoming days/weeks that I would post “some additional thoughts and insights” regarding the campaign. At the time, my intent was to inform voters about the horrific ways some within the Party treat our candidates, including my own experiences, which included false and malicious statements by (1) a state committeeperson, immediately preceding a vote – so I wouldn’t be made aware of the false allegation until after the vote and thus unable to correct it – that I allegedly falsified an endorsement of a sheriff and (2) the Dauphin County State Committee Chair alleging that I contended I was endorsed by a sitting Justice, who was not up for election (which is ethically impermissible), when I never did anything of the sort. And these examples were just the tip of the iceberg of the dirty politics played by some in the Republican Party in the May Primary judicial races and quite honestly, the “lengthy article” would probably be better described as a book…

But, I decided not to publish the article, because I realized that we, as a Party, were headed into an extremely important election cycle with four major appellate court vacancies on the ballot, including one for the Supreme Court. I recognized that as much as I wanted for people to truly know what occurs – as I, prior to this experience, would have never imagined such would occur, especially in judicial elections – it would only be divisive and result in less likelihood of success for our judicial candidates. And thus, I didn’t for the sake of the Party.

But, unlike myself, others within the Party don’t feel the same. Some believe more divisiveness, the better, because they believe it consolidates their (dwindling) power by removing those whom don’t fall in lockstep with their views. Instead of unifying the Party post-Primary, in Chester investigative hearings of four comitteepersons are being scheduled based on complaints received regarding the omission of a local endorsed county Republican candidate, in Montgomery one committeeperson has already been removed for support of an unendorsed Republican candidate, and in Cumberland, they want to remove nine duly elected committeepersons because they supported Republican candidates in the Primary that weren’t anointed…err, endorsed. And of course, beyond removal of committeepersons for support of a Republican in a primary being directly contrary to the State Committee Bylaws (and resultantly, contrary to the law in Pennsylvania), the outlandishly hypocritical nature of these actions are on full display, when one looks to the last November election and whether and to what degree these county chairs supported our Party’s gubernatorial and other candidates. But that isn’t even the most obscene. In Cumberland County, the committeepeople for three consecutive years have refused to adopt a bylaw provision that would allow for removal in such a situation and yet, the chair is moving forward with removal of committeepeople anyway in the absence of such authority…

As a result of my recent campaign and people knowing what I stand for, numerous individuals and groups reached out to me upon learning of these actions and explaining that if these County GOPs move forward with removal of the committeepeople, not only will they not support any Republican candidates in November but they will also switch to the Independent or Constitutional Parties. Not wanting that to occur and understanding what all is on the line this November, on June 28th, I sent a letter to Pennsylvania Republican Party Chairman Lawrence Tabas imploring him to intervene and unify our Party.

Unfortunately, as of publishing this article, to the best of my knowledge, no action has been taken. And given the communications I’ve received, it sounds like the the County GOPs intend to move forward with removing duly elected committeepeople who supported Republican candidates, merely because those candidates were not the anointed ones. These chairs seem to forget the background leading up to and purpose of the direct primary election, which was first adopted in 1842 by the Democratic Party, due to members feeling disenfranchised by the convention nomination/endorsement process and the need, for the survival of the Party, to find a process by which everyone’s voice would be heard and given equal weight. And facing identical concern in 1860, the Republican Party likewise adopted the direct primary process, with the understanding that if our members were provided a voice and equal say in the primary regarding the candidates, even if one’s particular candidate was not successful, we would all unify, as Republicans, in the general election. Unfortunately, this has been forgotten in the recent past by some in our Party and instead of allowing our members’ voices to be heard and given equal say in the primary, with us unifying in the general, some only care about their power to always have their chosen candidate on the ballot and quashing any other voices. While such works quite well in a dictatorship, it doesn’t work at all in a Republic…

While there’s still time for Chairman Tabas to intervene – and I implore him to do so – before these County GOPs pull the trigger and kill the PA Republican Party, if no action is taken to end the divisiveness and to unify our Party, while November will be bleak, it will be of no comparison as to how bad 2024 and future elections will be…

27 thoughts on “Russian Roulette – The Death Of The PA Republican Party By Its Own Hand

  1. Well what can I do to help? Everything is determined by local elections. My opinion Cutler, and Alment have their hands all over this corruption.

    Like

  2. I left the party partly because of the way they act, other candidates have exposed the way the party treats potential candidates.

    Unfortunately you have also played a part, by stepping back because this is an “extremely important election”
    As long as every election is extremely important nothing will change.

    The party is full of petulant children, anyone who follows state politics knows this.

    They routinely back flawed candidates while overlooking good ones.
    Mastriano? Really?
    Dr. Oz? Really?

    Maybe the party needs to die.
    Will it hurt? Yes.
    But at this point we are getting substandard candidates who are losing and the party is blind, ignorant or whatever.

    I’m fine supporting the party, my single name off their rolls doesn’t hurt them but at least I know I’m not helping them spiral around the bowl they are heading into, they are doing that on their own.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. With Mastriano and Oz the party would be in good hands even though you opted for others. Did you support those candidates? If not you are the problem and deserve to be called out for helping the radical left Democrats..

      Like

  3. Sounds like the offending officials should be drummed out of the Republican Party conduct unbecoming being a detriment to the success of the party or whatever the correct language would be at the end of the day United we stand decided we fall we cannot afford to fall the democrats will turn Pennsylvania into a police state or are they rinos in bed with the enemies of freedom

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I have a problem with the selection made as the endorsed candidate. She has never tried a case at any level so what makes her qualified to be an appellant Judge? Because of that reason and my ability to think for myself, I could not vote for her. I voted for you as the best candidate for the position. Of course this fall, she will get her butt kicked because other people also have the ability to think. I hope the Chairman intervenes and stops this nonsense.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Does it bother anyone that some of these so called Republican leaders were recent Democrats that switched parties? What better way to gain power than to destroy your competition?

    Liked by 1 person

  6. As a friend merely soliciting extremely hypothetical legal clarification, one supposes that gallows and gibbets are not a current option to correct the postures of would-be overlords?

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Too many rinos and self interest groups truly make this party unpalatable. Perhaps it’s time for a third party after all.
    Oh, and also, could the liars and slanderers be sued, so the similar creeps think before they try to defame people?

    Like

Leave a comment