PSP PICS System Stripped of Funding for 2017-2018

At midnight last night, in the absence of Governor Wolf taking any action, HB 218 became law, which, inter alia, stripped the Pennsylvania State Police of the $4,575,000 of additional funding sought by the PSP for the Pennsylvania Instant Check System (PICS) for 2017-2018.


As you can see, although the PSP putatively did not have any remaining PICS funds from the 2016-2017 budget (unlike every other appropriation), the PSP has $9.8 million in a restricted account, just for use for PICS and which was generated from PICS. So much for PSP’s argument that they lose money in relation to PICS. I also have on good information that $3.3 million of the $9.8 million was just added last year. Requests for more information regarding the receipt of funds to this restricted account have been requested.

While some savvy individuals reviewing HB 218 might point to the $8,757,000 seemingly being appropriated for the “Firearm Records Check Fund,” it is important to explain that such is the removal of that amount from the PSP’s restricted account, reducing it from $9.8 million to approximately $1 million.

It is time for the citizens of Pennsylvania to stop paying millions of dollars, each year, for a broken and duplicative system, when the FBI offer NICS to us for free.


2 thoughts on “PSP PICS System Stripped of Funding for 2017-2018

  1. It all depends if PICS follows the exact criteria as NICS then it would duplicitous and a waste of money; but as we know, the last administration was hell bent on circumventing the Congress with regards to gun control . They started to discriminate against veterans and elderly people by adding restrictions of which the NICS system was abused in order to restrict gun rights. If PICS doesn`t have these restrictions then Pennsylvania citizens wanting to own firearm`s would be better served by the less restrictive PICS.


    1. Let me assure you that the PSP is no friend or ally of ours and under the current administration, I have seen a DRASTIC change in their position. They have been chastised by the FBI for denying individuals, where they do not have evidence to support that the person is prohibited. And it gets FAR worse than that – there’s an issue brewing right now, that I cannot disclose but is FAR worse than anything FBI would do.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s